Legal basis
Identify current statutory authority, decision-maker, route, due process, appeal and areas requiring qualified legal advice.
A proposal should not move from discussion to pilot until its legal basis, rights effects, safeguarding, data use, administration, cost, outcomes and consultation record have been examined.
Decision gates
Identify current statutory authority, decision-maker, route, due process, appeal and areas requiring qualified legal advice.
Assess protected characteristics, indirect discrimination, proportionality, dignity, family life, liberty and access to remedy.
Test effects on children, victims of trafficking or abuse, disabled people, people experiencing trauma and other vulnerable groups.
Define lawful purpose, minimum data, access, retention, sharing, security, correction and deletion.
Record staffing, training, interpretation, technology, accommodation, appeals, oversight and opportunity cost.
Predefine benefits, harms, baseline, comparator, time horizon, subgroup analysis and stopping criteria.
Seek challenge from affected people, practitioners, local services, employers, unions, charities, lawyers and researchers.
Publish the evidence considered, unresolved objections, decision owner, review date, corrections and reasons for change.
Current position
The existence of this framework does not mean any proposal has passed it. A completed assessment must cite current law and evidence, record material disagreement and identify any independent review. The editable working assessment is maintained privately so unverified draft judgements are not mistaken for public findings.
Related controls
Claim, evidence, harm, safeguard, measure and disconfirmation.
Rights, equality, vulnerability and unintended consequences.
Evidence, criticism, corrections and lived experience.
Questions, alternatives, evaluation design and falsifiability.