ASU Immigration Proposed StandardsIndependent theory and standards investigation
Phase 3 evaluation control

Proposal assessment framework

A proposal should not move from discussion to pilot until its legal basis, rights effects, safeguarding, data use, administration, cost, outcomes and consultation record have been examined.

01

Decision gates

Eight assessments before reliance or implementation

Legal boundary

Legal basis

Identify current statutory authority, decision-maker, route, due process, appeal and areas requiring qualified legal advice.

Rights review

Equality and human rights

Assess protected characteristics, indirect discrimination, proportionality, dignity, family life, liberty and access to remedy.

Safety review

Safeguarding

Test effects on children, victims of trafficking or abuse, disabled people, people experiencing trauma and other vulnerable groups.

Data assessment

Information and privacy

Define lawful purpose, minimum data, access, retention, sharing, security, correction and deletion.

Delivery test

Cost and administration

Record staffing, training, interpretation, technology, accommodation, appeals, oversight and opportunity cost.

Outcome test

Measures and comparison

Predefine benefits, harms, baseline, comparator, time horizon, subgroup analysis and stopping criteria.

Open review

Consultation

Seek challenge from affected people, practitioners, local services, employers, unions, charities, lawyers and researchers.

Audit trail

Decision and correction

Publish the evidence considered, unresolved objections, decision owner, review date, corrections and reasons for change.

02

Current position

No automatic approval

The existence of this framework does not mean any proposal has passed it. A completed assessment must cite current law and evidence, record material disagreement and identify any independent review. The editable working assessment is maintained privately so unverified draft judgements are not mistaken for public findings.

03

Related controls

Use alongside the existing research pages

Consultation

Evidence, criticism, corrections and lived experience.

Research method

Questions, alternatives, evaluation design and falsifiability.